Teaching-preparation
has become so easy in church’s Sunday school classes because of the
availability of the ready-made teaching materials. All are already there from
the passage, the objectives of the lesson and even a step by step procedure on
how to execute them. I have nothing against these materials, content-wise they
are so rich and well-planned. The 4 A’s of teaching: Activity, Analysis,
Abstraction and Application are all represented, emphasized and detailed. But what I am concerned of is the teacher
himself/herself. The one who uses this
ready-made lessons. How does his/her
teaching intention go along with the content of the material he/she teaches? What is the teacher up to when he/she
instructs?
The tendency to have a “soulless-teaching”
has a very strong inclination to the teacher who follows a manual. I think, Sunday school teachers should also
evaluate themselves on the way they use the teaching materials. Are they treating it as
something that dictates them what to do without a "deep" understanding the purpose of
each content? Are they being "slaves" of the ready-made materials because of the
comfort-benefits? Or are they still the “masters” of these materials? Do they
let the lesson/passage in the material speak and teach them first?
What I am trying to drive at is that the materials and the contents of
the lessons will all be all lifeless unless the teacher soulfully and truthfully submits to the
heart and the intention of the whole learning process. Another
thing that I would like to raise is that these materials should not
encourage complacency in the “quality” time that the teacher will devote himself/herself
in preparing his/her lessons but instead, these should invite the teacher to see-through
the soul of the “intent” and “content” found in these manuals. This is what I call the “soul trek” in
teaching preparation.
Yes, I believe also that teaching should
nurture the mind, teaching should touch the heart and teaching should move the
hands of the learners. But, for me, the gist of teaching has something to do
with the “soul of integrity” of a teacher—meaning, he/she has already
experienced the process or the journey of the lesson he/he will bring to
his/her learners. He/she knows the “soul”
within what he/she is about to teach. The
soul of integrity in teaching is when the teacher comes in class well-prepared
inside and throughout. When the teacher
with all integrity stands in class not with the “manual” in mind dictating
him/her what to do next but whole-heartedly has analyzed the “content” and the “gist”
of learning he/she will transmit to his/her learners.
Teaching is transmission, how could one teacher
transmit if his/her hands are empty? In every
lesson, a teacher should personally discover a "new learning" first. He/she
should have the first-hand journey on how wonderful that new learning was and
how it will be too to each of his/her student. In all this, I believe that it is a healthy
practice for a teacher to be able to traverse his/her personal “soul trek” on
his/her particular lesson before coming to class and for me that is the gist of
teaching!